Work has been unfortunately busy lately, and when I am robbed of the ability to think of my book in the background all day, the nights go slower and run longer. Another product launch Monday, and that’s it for the year, so all should go smoothly again now, but it’s been a dry patch.
I guess I could subscribe to the notion that any progress is a positive step toward finishing. But unless I crank out a pile of text in any given night, I kind of feel like I’ve been wasting my time and I would have been better off going to the movies, or out to a play, etc.
So, this morning, I went and saw Harry Potter, and again I am struck by how much I don’t like that style of writing. Same with Lord of the Rings. It just seems like there are just huge, spectacular passages/sets, loosely strung together. You don’t connect with Harry, he seems to be very passive about everything that goes on around him, and something entirely unexplained always saves him at the last possible second.
I’m not saying it is bad storytelling. It just doesn’t resonate with me. I like surprising elements in a story to exist within the dynamic of what I know as an audience member. Even in the Sixth Sense, the fact that he’s dead isn’t really a secret, he was shot in the first scene. The audience is led to watch the movie from a specific perspective, but then it all lines up when we are told something different.
HARRY SPOILERS NOW: In Harry Potter, it’s always just something happens and needs not be explained before or sufficiently after. Harry is fighting a big snake and can’t look in his eyes or he will die. So, he’s hidden in the chamber of secrets which no one knows how to find, and as soon as the snake appears, Dumbledore’s phoenix comes and pokes its eyes out (so that Harry can now fight him), and brings the sorting hat. OK, this is a stretch, but the bird knew how to find him, fine. Then, as the snake gets closer to Harry, a sword appears inside the hat. OK, great, but it just becomes a bit much for me. Even Harry never seems to think his life is in danger.
In the Quidditch match, a ball (or whatever it’s called) is on a rampage trying to kill Harry. It is literally smashing huge holes through wooden structures trying to knock him off his broomstick. He is still trying to play the game, annoyed that his life is in danger more than concerned, everyone else is just watching like anything goes at Hogwarts.
Harry and Ron are trapped by the spiders and their flying car just shows up and saves them, in much the same way it randomly disappeared when they arrived at school. And how is the station where you get on the Hogwarts train only accessible to wizards, etc., but the train itself seems to exist in th real world after it leaves the station.
I mean, why am I supposed to care about this kid’s life if he doesn’t, his friends don’t (OK, Hermione wants to use her wand to stop the ball), and all the faculty of the school seem disinterested with everything, too. My guess is that even at Hogwarts, a Quidditch ball under a spell trying to kill one of the players should be against the rules.
Maybe that is how they get away with this stuff, by setting them in these alternate worlds. LOTR was more of the same. Kid is chosen, gets the ring, and then has one random adventure after another, is indifferent about it all, and goes places for the most threadbare reasons where some adventure happens, and he barely escapes. But since it isn’t set in the present-day criminal justice system or someplace where the same rules that apply to the reader exists, we just have to shrug and accept their world, since they apparently do the same.
Now, I know the criticism already, and people are going to say that you have to read the book to get the real picture of these stories. I disagree. I did read the first Harry Potter, and I thought the same thing about it. I was so disinterested with the first Lord of the Rings movie, I can’t imagine reading the book. But, the deal is, I shouldn’t have to read a book to understand a movie. That’s why I am in a movie. Movies aren’t supposed to be abstracts for books.
Of course, I am writing transitional book chapters a lot lately, too, so this is exactly what I’m fixated in my own book right now. Maybe the audience doesn’t care about transition of continuity or there being a point as to why one chapter comes before another… would certainly make it easier.
Jeff